https://journal.indonesia-orthopaedic.org/index.php/j-paboi/issue/feedJurnal Orthopaedi dan Traumatologi Indonesia2024-11-08T11:24:48+00:00Jurnal Orthopaedi dan Traumatologi Indonesiajournal_indonesianorthopaedic@yahoo.comOpen Journal Systems<table style="height: 290px;" width="576"> <tbody> <tr> <td width="29%"> <p>Journal title</p> </td> <td width="69%"> <p><strong>Jurnal Orthopaedi dan Traumatologi Indonesia</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="29%"> <p>Initials</p> </td> <td width="69%"> <p><strong>JOTI</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="29%"> <p>Frequency</p> </td> <td width="69%"> <p><strong>3 issues per year</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="29%"> <p>DOI</p> </td> <td width="69%"> <p><strong>Prefix 10.31282</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="29%"> <p>ISSN</p> </td> <td width="69%"> <p><a href="http://u.lipi.go.id/1597852616"><strong>2621-0134</strong> </a><strong>(print)</strong> | <a href="http://u.lipi.go.id/1597849616"><strong>2656-5250</strong></a><strong> (online)</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="29%"> <p>Editor-in-chief</p> </td> <td width="69%"> <p><strong>Asep Santoso, MD </strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="29%"> <p>Publisher</p> </td> <td width="69%"> <p><strong>Indonesian Orthopaedic Association</strong></p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p>Jurnal Orthopaedi dan Traumatologi Indonesia (JOTI) is issued oficially by Indonesian Orthopaedic Association and published once every 4 months. JOTI receives original basic research or clinical research report, case series or case report, literature reviews and editorial.</p> <p>All manuscripts submitted to Jurnal Orthopaedi dan Traumatologi Indonesia must be solely submitted to this journal and not previously published or under consideration by other publication, must be an original work which has been reviewed and approved by the author and co-authors for publication. Such circumstances must be stated by all authors by signing and submittiting the form attached at the end of this session. Upon admission, the manuscripts become the property of this journal and may not be republished in any form without the consent of thepublisher.</p> <p>All manucripts presented to Jurnal Orthopaedi dan Traumatologi Indonesia will be subjected to evaluation by peer reviewers and editors. Authors may need to enhance their manuscript in accordance to the reviewer’s and editor’s recommendation. Failure to follow the recommendation may result in rejection to publish the papers. Any rejected manuscript will not be returned to authors. Editors will inform the author whether the article is accepted or rejected. All papers submitted should have acquired approval from the committee of ethics, any study involving human experimentation should have a signed informed consent.</p> <p> </p>https://journal.indonesia-orthopaedic.org/index.php/j-paboi/article/view/249Strong Correlation Between Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score and Modified Mayo Wrist Score Affected by Radius Union Scoring System and C-Reactive Protein in Patients with Conservatively Managed Distal Radius Fracture2024-01-15T14:50:52+00:00Ryan Putrarpwondany@gmail.comPutu Astawap.astawa46@gmail.comI Ketut Suyasaik.suyasa66@gmail.comMade Bramantya Karnamb.karna70@outlook.com<p><strong>Introduction:</strong> <br />Fractures of the distal radius are the most common fractures in the upper extremity. The conservative management of these fractures often yields favorable outcomes, which can be measured using various scoring systems, and are often associated with controlled inflammatory response. This study aims to determine whether the Modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS) can be an alternative to the gold standard Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score. Additionally, we investigate the effect of the Radius Union Scoring System (RUSS) and the C-Reactive Protein (CRP) inflammatory marker to those scores.</p> <p><br /><strong>Material & Methods:</strong> <br />Patient samples were consecutively taken from a population of patients with conservatively managed distal radius fractures using a cast. The patients were treated with a cast for 6 weeks, followed by a radiographic evaluation to assess the RUSS score and blood sampling in the 9th week to measure CRP level. In the 12th week, the DASH and MMWS were assessed. </p> <p><strong>Result:</strong> <br />Correlative analysis showed a strong correlation between MMWS and DASH score, and a predictive correlation between RUSS and CRP level toward MMWS and DASH score. </p> <p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> <br />The MMWS scoring system correlates with the DASH score, making it a promising scoring system in clinical practice, while a high RUSS score and low 9th-week CRP level can cause better functional outcomes in patients with conservatively managed distal radius fracture.</p>2024-11-08T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Orthopaedi dan Traumatologi Indonesiahttps://journal.indonesia-orthopaedic.org/index.php/j-paboi/article/view/270Returning to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Active Non-Athlete Individual: A Literature Review2024-05-07T03:08:05+00:00Nafisa Salma Wulandarinafisawlndr@gmail.computri sandra Syakillaputriblogict@gmail.comerica kholinneerica@trisakti.ac.idkarina ganikarina.sylvana@yahoo.commitchelmitchelx42@gmail.com<p>Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears frequently occur as sports injuries, particularly in active young individuals. ACL reconstruction is a standard treatment for active individuals seeking to return to sports. Prehabilitation and post-operative rehabilitation therapy play crucial roles in strengthening the quadriceps and hamstrings before ACL reconstruction, facilitating the healing process, and enabling a return to sports at the pre-injury level. However, determining the appropriate time to resume sports activities after the injury is a complex and multifaceted decision-making process. Many criteria are considered for returning to sport after ACL reconstruction. Most surgeons suggest that individuals return to sports after nine months, with a limb symmetry index greater than >90% symmetry LSI criteria in hop tests and individuals exhibiting greater psychological readiness were more likely to return to sports.</p>2024-11-08T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Orthopaedi dan Traumatologi Indonesiahttps://journal.indonesia-orthopaedic.org/index.php/j-paboi/article/view/274Current Update in Achilles Tendon Rupture Management: Operative or Nonoperative?2024-04-15T00:59:05+00:00Farrell Hartoyofarrellhartoyo11@gmail.comPatricia Melissa Alim Santosoptriciamelissa@gmail.comMaria Florencia Desliviamfdeslivia@gmail.comAstuti Pitariniastuti.pitarini@gmail.comJ.B Endrotomojbendrotomo@rscarolus.or.idIfran Salehifran_ortho@yahoo.com<p>The Achilles tendon is the most commonly ruptured tendon in the foot and ankle region. The peak incidence of Achilles tendon rupture occurs in the age range of 30-49 years, with a higher prevalence among males. Various risk factors, including aging, obesity, episodic athletic activity, engagement in high-impact sports, antibiotic use, and systemic factors, contribute to the occurrence of Achilles tendon rupture. Beyond the injury mechanism, it is crucial to assess any history of minor or repetitive trauma to the Achilles tendon and identify associated risk factors. Thorough examination and comparison of both the affected and unaffected sides are essential. While the diagnosis of Achilles Tendon Rupture is primarily clinical, radiological imaging can aid in visualizing the tendon gap. Treatment options for Achilles tendon rupture include conservative and surgical approaches. Despite a lower re-rupture rate associated with surgical treatment, recent evidence suggests that conservative treatment provides comparable results. However, return to activity was found to be better in surgical treatment with early rehabilitation</p>2024-11-08T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Orthopaedi dan Traumatologi Indonesiahttps://journal.indonesia-orthopaedic.org/index.php/j-paboi/article/view/263Outcome Comparison Between Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Versus Conservative Treatment in Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis2024-02-22T15:34:17+00:00Putu Angga Dharmayudaorthopediunud23a@gmail.comI Gusti Lanang Ngurah Agung Artha Wigunalanangortho@gmail.com<p><strong>Introduction:</strong> <br />Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) are common in older adults and cause chronic back discomfort and kyphotic deformity. Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) is preferred over conservative treatment (CT) for pain relief and quality of life improvement. However, there are ongoing debates about PVP's effectiveness and safety, with some suggesting it should only be available to patients who have exhausted other non-invasive options.</p> <p><strong>Methods:</strong> <br />A systematic review was conducted following the principles outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A thorough literature search was conducted to get a complete, peer-reviewed manuscript in English that compares the outcomes of vertebroplasty versus conservative therapy in osteoporotic compression fractures. We conducted a comprehensive search on PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library. This systematic study aims to compare the therapeutic efficacy of vertebroplasty versus conservative therapy.</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong> <br />The electronic investigation identified 236 entries from various databases, screening them for eligibility, assessing duplicates, and eliminating duplicates, resulting in 9 studies for qualitative and quantitative synthesis. The heterogeneity across studies was examined throughout the I2 statistic described as follows: low, 25% to 50%; moderate 50% to 75%; or high>75%. There is no significant difference found in 1 week and 3 months of pain relief in these two groups in pain relief (mean difference 0.73 (-0.52, 1.96); 95% CI, P = 0,25); (mean difference -0.76 (-2.02, 0.49); 95% CI, =0.23). we found no statistically significant difference between those two groups favoring the PVP group in terms of quality-of-life outcome (mean difference -0.76 (-2.02, 0.49); 95% CI, P < 0.23); (mean difference 1.75 (-0.87, 4.38); 95% CI, P < 0.19). PVP has no association with new adjacent vertebral fractures. (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI <br />-0.07 (-0.17, 0.03); I2 = 0%, P = 0.16).</p> <p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> <br />Comparatively, percutaneous vertebroplasty was determined to be more effective in alleviating pain and enhancing quality of life, without posing an elevated risk of nearby vertebral fracture as compared to the CT group. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a more extensive investigation to determine which patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) are most likely to experience a positive outcome following percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) with little risk of sequelae.</p>2024-11-08T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Orthopaedi dan Traumatologi Indonesiahttps://journal.indonesia-orthopaedic.org/index.php/j-paboi/article/view/266The Relationship between Morphometry of The Proximal Femur Bone and The Type of Proximal Femur Bone Fracture in The Elderly Female Population at RSUP H. Adam Malik Medan from 2017 to 20222024-04-15T00:56:15+00:00Clement Tirtaclement.tirta@yahoo.comAga Ketarendr.agashahri@gmail.comChairiandi SiregarSchairiandi@gmail.com<p><strong>Background:</strong> <br />Fractures of the pelvic bone are frequently encountered in elderly patients and are often associated with increased mortality rates. At the moment, identifying osteoporosis as a risk factor for proximal femur fractures is the primary focus. The morphometry of the proximal femur can also be utilized to predict the risk factors for proximal femur fractures. This study was conducted to assess the relationship between proximal femur bone morphometry and proximal femur fractures in elderly women at H. Adam Malik General Teaching Hospital, Medan.</p> <p><strong>Material & Methods:</strong> <br />This study is an observational analytical research aimed at investigating the relationship between the morphometry of the proximal femur bone and the type of proximal femur bone fracture in an elderly female population. The study will adhere to predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The morphometric variables measured in this study are hip axis length (HAL), femoral head diameter (FHD), femoral neck length (FNL), femoral neck diameter (FND), horizontal offset (HO), and femoral neck shaft angle (FNSA). </p> <p><strong>Result:</strong> <br />This study collected 90 samples, with 15 of them not meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria, resulting in a final sample size of 75. Out of 75 research samples, the Hip Axis Length (HAL) has an Eta test value of 0.264. The Femoral Head Diameter (FHD) has an Eta test value of 0.162. The Femoral Neck Diameter (FND) has an Eta test value of 0.276. The Femoral Neck Length (FNL) has an Eta test value of 0.277. The Horizontal Offset (HO) has an Eta test value of 0.277. The Femoral Neck Shaft Angle (FNSA) has an Eta test value of 0.488. </p> <p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> <br />This study reports a weak correlation between the morphometry of hip axis length, femoral neck diameter, femoral neck length, femoral neck diameter, and horizontal offset of the proximal femur with proximal femur fractures. Furthermore, a moderate correlation was found between the morphometry of the femoral neck-shaft angle of the proximal femur and the type of proximal femur fracture.</p>2024-11-08T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Orthopaedi dan Traumatologi Indonesia