Clinical Outcome of Medial Meniscus Root Reconstruction Versus Root Repair in Managing Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear

Authors

  • John Christian Parsaoran Butarbutar Universitas Pelita Harapan, Departement of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Siloam Hospitals Lippo Village, Tangerang, Indonesia
  • Albert Riantho Universitas Pelita Harapan, Faculty of Medicine, Tangerang, Indonesia. Departement of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Siloam Hospitals Lippo Village, Tangerang, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2317-3559
  • Kevin Fidiasrianto Universitas Pelita Harapan, Faculty of Medicine, Tangerang, Indonesia. Departement of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Siloam Hospitals Lippo Village, Tangerang, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6796-5876
  • Gian Ivander Universitas Pelita Harapan, Faculty of Medicine, Tangerang, Indonesia. Departement of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Siloam Hospitals Lippo Village, Tangerang, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3817-8544

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31282/joti.v7n1.124

Keywords:

Meniscus tear , Medial meniscus posterior root tear, Transtibial pull-out repair , Meniscus root reconstruction , Gracilis autograft

Abstract

Introduction: Optimal treatment of a medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) is essential for restoring joint kinematics, and contact pressures, and preventing the progression of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Recently, transtibial pull-out repair has been the preferred treatment for MMPR tear. However, the repair techniques do not provide any biological structure to enhance biological healing. Reconstruction of the meniscus root with gracilis autograft may reproduce the ligamentous structure resembling the original root. The objective of this study is to assess and compare the clinical effectiveness of medial meniscus root reconstruction and root repair.

Method: Patients who received arthroscopic surgical treatment for MMPRT were included in this study. Twenty patients who had been diagnosed with MMPR tear were divided into two groups: those who underwent transtibial pull-out repair (10 cases) and those who underwent meniscus root reconstruction with gracilis autograft (10 cases). Each patient then underwent a surgical procedure according to their

respective group. Clinical outcomes were assessed using visual analog score (VAS) and KOOS score in 3 months follow-up.

Result: Both groups had no significant differences in the baseline characteristics. Compared to the repair group, the reconstruction group demonstrated significant mean VAS reduction (p= 0,001) at 3 months. However, there was no significant difference in the mean KOOS score at 3 months (p=0.481).

Conclusion: The meniscus root reconstruction using gracilis autograft offers significant benefits with superior outcomes in VAS score compared to transtibial pull-out repair, however, there were no differences on clinical outcome at 3 months follow-up

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

References

Fukubayashi T, Kurosawa H. the contact area and pressure distribution pattern of the knee: A study of normal and osteoarthrotic knee joints. Acta Orthop. 1980;51(1-6):871-879. doi:10.3109/17453678008990887

Bhatia S, Laprade CM, Ellman MB, Laprade RF. Meniscal root tears: Significance, diagnosis, and treatment. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(12):3016-3030. doi:10.1177/0363546514524162

Lee DW, Ha JK, Kim JG. Medial meniscus posterior root tear: A comprehensive review. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2014;26(3):125-134. doi:10.5792/ksrr.2014.26.3.125

Srimongkolpitak S, Chernchujit B. Current concepts on meniscal repairs. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2022;27:101810. doi:10.1016/j.jcot.2022.101810

Holmes SW, Huff LW, Montoya KJ, Durkin MW, Baier AJ. Arthroscopic Medial Meniscal Root Reconstruction With Gracilis Autograft Is Safe and Improves 2-Year Postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes. Arthrosc Sport Med Rehabil. 2022;4(4):e1339-e1346. doi:10.1016/j.asmr.2022.04.018

Li H, Nie S, Lan M. Medial meniscus posterior root tear reconstructed with gracilis autograft improve healing rate and patient reported outcome measures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23(1):1-8. doi:10.1186/s12891-022-06067-1

Feucht MJ, Grande E, Brunhuber J, et al. Biomechanical comparison between suture anchor and transtibial pull-out repair for posterior medial meniscus root tears. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(1):187-193. doi:10.1177/0363546513502946

Lee DW, Haque R, Chung KS, Kim JG. Arthroscopic Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Reconstruction Using Auto-Gracilis Tendon. Arthrosc Tech. 2017;6(4):e1431-e1435. doi:10.1016/j.eats.2017.07.014

Choi SH, Bae S, Ji SK, Chang MJ. The MRI findings of meniscal root tear of the medial meniscus: Emphasis on coronal, sagittal and axial images. Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(10):2098-2103. doi:10.1007/s00167-011-1794-4

Delgado DA, Lambert BS, Boutris N, et al. Validation of Digital Visual Analog Scale Pain Scoring With a Traditional Paper-based Visual Analog Scale in Adults. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2018;2(3). doi:10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-17-00088

Kersten P, White PJ, Tennant A. Is the pain visual analogue scale linear and responsive to change? An exploration using rasch analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(6). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0099485

Collins NJ, Prinsen CAC, Christensen R, Bartels EM, Terwee CB, Roos EM. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): systematic review and meta-analysis of measurement properties. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2016;24(8):1317-1329. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2016.03.010

Jackson GR, Lee JS, Asif S, et al. DIFFERENT SUTURE CONFIGURATIONS FOR TRANSTIBIAL PULLOUT REPAIR FOR MEDIAL MENISCUS ROOT TEARS YIELD IMPROVED MID-TERM CLINICAL OUTCOMES : A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. Published online 2023:1-8.

Zhuo H, Chen Q, Zhu F, Li J. Arthroscopic side-to-side repair for complete radial posterior lateral meniscus root tears. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):1-6. doi:10.1186/s12891-020-3156-1

Jing L, Liu K, Wang X, et al. Second-look arthroscopic findings after medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy combined with all-inside repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears. J Orthop Surg. 2020;28(1):1-8. doi:10.1177/2309499019888836

Ulku TK, Kaya A, Kocaoglu B. Suture configuration techniques have no effect on mid-term clinical outcomes of arthroscopic meniscus root repairs. Knee. 2020;27(3):676-682. doi:10.1016/j.knee.2020.04.017

Moon HS, Choi CH, Jung M, Lee DY, Hong SP, Kim SH. Early Surgical Repair of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear Minimizes the Progression of Meniscal Extrusion: Response. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49(1):NP3-NP5. doi:10.1177/0363546520974380

Feucht MJ, Kühle J, Bode G, et al. Arthroscopic Transtibial Pullout Repair for Posterior Medial Meniscus Root Tears: A Systematic Review of Clinical, Radiographic, and Second-Look Arthroscopic Results. Arthrosc - J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2015;31(9):1808-1816. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2015.03.022

Krych AJ, Nauert RF, Song BM, et al. Association Between Transtibial Meniscus Root Repair and Rate of Meniscal Healing and Extrusion on Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Prospective Multicenter Study. Orthop J Sport Med. 2021;9(8):1-8. doi:10.1177/23259671211023774

Seo HS, Lee SC, Jung KA. Second-look arthroscopic findings after repairs of posterior root tears of the medial meniscus. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(1):99-107. doi:10.1177/0363546510382225

Chung KS, Ha JK, Ra HJ, Nam GW, Kim JG. Pullout Fixation of Posterior Medial Meniscus Root Tears. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(1):42-49. doi:10.1177/0363546516662445

Additional Files

Published

2024-10-16

Issue

Section

Original Research Article